Skip to main content

Is polyamory part of the LGBTQ+ community?

The two labels answer different questions. LGBTQ+ names sexual orientations and gender identities; polyamory describes how relationships are structured, with more than one loving relationship at a time and everyone’s knowledge. A person of any orientation or gender can be polyamorous, and a person can be LGBTQ+ and entirely monogamous. Whether you count yourself in is a personal call.

Illustrative scene: adults getting to know each other at a white-night social
Illustrative scene, not JoinTheSwing members or an advertised event.

LGBTQ+ is an umbrella for sexual orientations — lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer — and gender identities, including transgender and non-binary. Polyamory is a way of structuring relationships: more than one loving relationship at a time, with everyone involved knowing and consenting. A person of any orientation and any gender can be polyamorous, and a person can be LGBTQ+ and entirely monogamous. The categories cross rather than nest.

One 2022 review in Current Opinion in Psychology treats non-monogamy as its own kind of diversity. It describes practitioners of consensual non-monogamy as a group that still experiences stigma and minority stress, notes that this intersects with other identities such as race and sexuality, and argues that relationship diversity belongs alongside gender and sexuality in the study of relationships and well-being (Scoats & Campbell). A 2025 interview study of disclosure describes non-monogamy as a set of relationship identities and structures, contrasting it with monogamous, heteronormative expectations (Anderson et al., Archives of Sexual Behavior).

Whether polyamory should count as an orientation is genuinely contested rather than settled. An article in the journal Sexualities (Klesse, 2014) sets out the debate: some people treat polyamory as a convenient label for their current relationships, others claim it as a core identity, and arguments have been made that polyamory is best understood as a sexual orientation comparable with homosexuality, heterosexuality or bisexuality. The article surveys those arguments and makes the case against the orientation framing, on the grounds that it carries real costs.

The sources here link non-monogamy to other identities only through stigma, not through a count of who belongs where. Consensual non-monogamy is associated with stigma and minority stress that varies by context — parenting and healthcare settings are the examples the review gives — and that intersects with other identities including race and sexuality (Scoats & Campbell, 2022). The disclosure study found that responses to disclosure are typically negative and that healthcare providers are typically uninformed about non-monogamy unless specifically trained (Anderson et al., 2025). Neither source measures how many polyamorous people are LGBTQ+, so this answer makes no claim about the size of any overlap.

So the practical answer depends on what you are asking. Whether polyamory should count as a sexual orientation is contested: some people claim it as one, and the article above argues against treating it that way. It is not a gender identity — it describes a relationship agreement. If you are asking whether polyamorous people belong in LGBTQ+ spaces and organisations, that is a decision each organisation makes, so ask them rather than assuming. And if you are asking whether you personally count, that is yours to decide, and nobody else’s label to assign. If you are looking for community, the answer on finding a non-monogamous community covers the practical routes.

How this answer was checked.

Publisher-authored explainer about how these terms are used in research and in the community, not a statement about anyone’s identity and not a claim about any organisation’s membership policy. The academic sources disagree about whether polyamory should be framed as an orientation, so this answer reports that disagreement instead of resolving it, and describes each source’s type and scope in the notes below so the claims can be checked directly.

  • Review article. States that stigma and minority stress persist for practitioners of consensual non-monogamy, that this intersects with identities such as race and sexuality, and argues that relationship diversity has a place alongside gender and sexuality. It is a review of the field, not a study of LGBTQ+ membership.

  • Interview study with 32 non-monogamous adults living in Australia. Describes non-monogamy as a set of relationship identities and structures and reports that responses to disclosure are typically negative. Qualitative; not a claim about how many polyamorous people are LGBTQ+.

  • Article surveying academic and activist debates about polyamory’s status. Records that some people claim polyamory as a core identity and that arguments have been made for treating it as a sexual orientation; the author argues against that framing. The copy read was the author final version held in Manchester Metropolitan University’s e-space repository, which does not state peer-review status — it is cited for the debate it documents, not as a study result.

Verified-only introductions, when JoinTheSwing opens.

Join the free list for registration updates. New registration is closed. The list is not an account or a subscription. Existing members can sign in on the website.

Who's joining?

Required for the US, Canada and Australia; optional elsewhere.

More about you — optional

We do not sell your email. Service providers process it as described in our Privacy Policy. 18+ only.